|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Jan 2, 2004 19:06:46 GMT -6
VOTE Little ones! ;D
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 2, 2004 19:11:30 GMT -6
I think my opinion is quite well known on this subject.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 2, 2004 19:12:33 GMT -6
I daresay it is...
|
|
|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Jan 2, 2004 20:18:11 GMT -6
Well, then who voted to save the environment?
|
|
|
Post by beanababe on Jan 2, 2004 22:11:30 GMT -6
Did anyone really care about the "fish" I mean come on Ocean Policy...and then all the nuke war impacts it's just not real. Leave the environment to take care of it's self. If the fish happen to die than that's cool.
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 3, 2004 9:44:35 GMT -6
Unfortuetly, there will always be stupid people in the world.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 3, 2004 14:23:01 GMT -6
I'm not saying that I voted to say the trees, but I am saying that I didn't vote to mercilessly exploit them in the name of capitalist domination of the Earth.
|
|
|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Jan 4, 2004 15:40:04 GMT -6
what good are they to us otherwise? ;D
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 6, 2004 17:57:26 GMT -6
He's just trying to irritate us...
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 6, 2004 19:32:06 GMT -6
Trees make air! If there were no trees, only BC [who is naturally abiotic and doesn't breath air] would be able to live! What sort of world is that!?
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 8, 2004 16:05:01 GMT -6
With only me alive and everyone else dead??!!!!! That'd be a Great world!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Jan 8, 2004 19:50:57 GMT -6
A lot of monosex. But hey, BC is afraid of cooties, so he's alright. Though he'll have to find a way to clone himself, and quickly!
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 9, 2004 7:23:00 GMT -6
No matter what would happen, it would be great because all of you would be dead!!!
|
|
|
Post by beanababe on Jan 9, 2004 23:05:26 GMT -6
Yeah but what fun is the Earth when you can't run it all by yourself... you will have to food, no lights, power, computer, it would suck...you could blow up 3rd World countries but if no one was there what funis that...Life would be boring....
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 10, 2004 11:21:00 GMT -6
Boring to normal people. Are you suggesting that I'm normal?
|
|
I AM THE IZOD!!
High Cleve Person
This is what happens when I eat too many baked beans.
Posts: 513
|
Post by I AM THE IZOD!! on Jan 10, 2004 14:23:59 GMT -6
But I'm to stupid to die. So I would live with him forever and I would drive him crazy!!!!
|
|
|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Jan 10, 2004 16:01:54 GMT -6
Don't worry BC no one is even TRYING to say your normal...
|
|
BillyBob
rubber duckie
If rabbits' feet are so lucky, then what happened to the rabbit?
Posts: 36
|
Post by BillyBob on Jan 10, 2004 20:25:12 GMT -6
Don't worry, soon enough evolution will do away with the stupid people who bring down our once grand country. It is my only prayer that evolution would speed up.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 10, 2004 21:40:59 GMT -6
...a world populated only by a single Andrew
There is a thought worth not thinking about
|
|
BillyBob
rubber duckie
If rabbits' feet are so lucky, then what happened to the rabbit?
Posts: 36
|
Post by BillyBob on Jan 11, 2004 13:58:02 GMT -6
Would it be possible to eradicate a single name, such as Andrew? I don't think so personaly.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 11, 2004 17:13:27 GMT -6
'Andrew' is not just a name, it aslo refers to a specis of singularily untolerable beings of whom BC is merely the last extant specimin..
PS. Swanson is not an Andrew, nor is Andy I----
|
|
|
Post by Swanson on Jan 11, 2004 17:37:34 GMT -6
I think you have all missed the point. No matter what happens, existance will go on, if there was no oxegen, then life would thrive on other things, as it did orginally, oxigen is only a bi-product, a waste, in essence, a fart, and with out it, there would be a good number of other different organisms. Perhaps some would even have reached sentience, I don't know, but to deny life would go on is a falacy, you cannot end life as a whole...
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 11, 2004 20:16:06 GMT -6
Sure we can, IZOD can fart and destroy the universe.
|
|
BillyBob
rubber duckie
If rabbits' feet are so lucky, then what happened to the rabbit?
Posts: 36
|
Post by BillyBob on Jan 11, 2004 20:21:09 GMT -6
Some disagree, there was a scientist at Berkley that once theorized in the mid 1980's that if the Earth had a global nukelear war. It would trigger several trillion Black holes and simaltaniously suck up the universe.
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 11, 2004 20:30:43 GMT -6
Er, I wonder what that would do to the nuke war DA's impacts?... Uh oh...
|
|
BillyBob
rubber duckie
If rabbits' feet are so lucky, then what happened to the rabbit?
Posts: 36
|
Post by BillyBob on Jan 11, 2004 20:37:47 GMT -6
That would make a great impact. The only thing is that i cannot find the evidence.
Old impact: Plan causes Nuke War New impact: Plan wipes out Universe
I have a feeling the SPASH judges would enjoy that one.
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 11, 2004 21:04:16 GMT -6
Get the evidence from that guy you mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 12, 2004 17:26:06 GMT -6
There's no need to wipe out all life in the universe; as HHGTTG points out, the population of the universe is already zero. Furthermore, as any mathimatician will point out, the probability of life existing period is essentially zero; again we don't exist. Better yet, any quantum physicist can tell you life is a necessary precondition for the existance of the universe: unfortunatley, the existance of the universe is a necessary precondition for life. Finally, any philosopher can tell you that this whole deal about 'sensience' is an absurd myth and ought to be ignored at once. Further, the idea that life will always continue to be is merely an extension of Buddhist pessimism and their drive to acquire nirvana, something already addressed in Weluvducsoha's ultimate goal of taking a nap.
|
|
|
Post by HCMBrainCandy on Jan 13, 2004 7:20:01 GMT -6
Let's go get ice cream!
|
|
|
Post by ionix on Jan 14, 2004 9:47:22 GMT -6
Okay.. Just because 2 million people limit themselves to save the environment, it woun't help! You still have the other 6 billion exploiting nature and .00001% of the population will do nothing! Environmentalism is a good theory, but fails in the real world.
|
|