|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Dec 25, 2004 12:18:43 GMT -6
my prediction is johnny by a landslide  |
|
|
|
Post by MOHC TheGirl on Dec 25, 2004 20:09:19 GMT -6
I'll beat worlin to oblivion for saying I have OMPHF or however it is you spell it!
|
|
|
|
Post by you smell like cabbage on Dec 25, 2004 22:09:13 GMT -6
i voted sarah Maymer because she redesigned the website with all these lovely colors and i enjoy them bundles. YAY MOHC Maymer!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Dec 27, 2004 19:22:50 GMT -6
You forgot Bill Clinton...
Maybe I watnted to vote for him!
On another note entirely....
I realized that eventhough the membership of Weluvducsoha is overwhelmingly conservative, every single pope we've ever had has been a liberal.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Dec 28, 2004 17:19:26 GMT -6
...I highly doubt you wanted to vote for Bill Clinton, but will you just vote already? (keep in mind, I invented poke Worlin Tuesday...and I made the board pretty)
hmmmm....the MOHC is infallible....every MOHC has been a liberal....by the transitive property, liberals are therefore infallible. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Dec 29, 2004 20:57:36 GMT -6
Your logic is somewhat flawed. That's like saying 'scientists know quantum phisics', 'all scientists are humans' therefore 'all humans know quantum physics'.
Consider this vastly more logical construct. 'the co-founders all think liberals are dumb', 'the cofounders are infallible' therefore 'liberals are dumb'
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Dec 29, 2004 22:01:13 GMT -6
um...you just said the exact same thing I did.
let me replace mine with your words...
"The MOHCs think that all conservatives are wrong. The MOHCs are infallible. Therefore all conservatives are wrong"
I just took your words and put in MOHC and conservatives and it made sense my way as well, even tho the two are very contradicting viewpoints. (also please note that I didn't say dumb, I said wrong. I figure that being rude and calling people dumb doesn't change the arguement, so I went with wrong)
...whatever....
The fundamental problem here is that co-founders and MOHC's are both infallible. Unless we can stop being mean and fighting about politics, this is a huge problem because someone has to be wrong. We could completely turn this and just decide that there is no right or wrong...and be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Dec 30, 2004 22:01:59 GMT -6
Co-founders overrule MOHCs.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Dec 31, 2004 0:20:10 GMT -6
so what if the cofounders don't agree?
....and why won't you vote for the best pope?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Dec 31, 2004 23:54:22 GMT -6
If two cofounders disagree they're both right.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 1, 2005 19:28:07 GMT -6
let's say swanson said i am infallible and you say i'm not. who's right? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 1, 2005 21:21:49 GMT -6
we both are.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 2, 2005 12:20:31 GMT -6
that doesn't make sense....but neither do a lot of things on this website....(9x6=42, etc.)
...but please!!! vote for the best pope....and make me a HCM
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 2, 2005 20:57:07 GMT -6
You're starting to catch on, I see...
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 2, 2005 21:59:28 GMT -6
well, i figure if you can't beat them, join them... ;D
...but i could beat you if i wanted to...but i lack the motivation and brain power. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 3, 2005 21:08:25 GMT -6
yes, naturally, but then I would be so depressed (there are few things worse then getting beat by a girl) that I would probably become a lawyer and run for president like John Kerry. He's a loser too!
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 3, 2005 21:33:56 GMT -6
oh my goodness, where do i begin?
there are few things worse than being beaten by a girl??-----johnny would strangle you for saying that!
and john kerry may be a loser that changed his opinion a lot...but at least that meant he was right half the time
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 4, 2005 21:22:43 GMT -6
50% is not a passing score.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 4, 2005 21:37:26 GMT -6
yeah, well bush is right zero percent of the time, so if we grade on a curve, that puts kerry ahead with kerry at 100% and add 50% to bush's score and look who's better!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 6, 2005 21:09:18 GMT -6
Howard Dean, because he's still at -1000%
|
|
|
|
Post by ionix on Jan 7, 2005 11:28:04 GMT -6
I think you should make me the pope.. I'm not liberal, I'm anarchist!
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 9, 2005 15:10:00 GMT -6
NO
Anarchists are stupid....and if you were pope of a religion and accepted your popehood as a form of governance, then that defeats your claim as an anarchist. That makes you pretty much a theocracist. Sort of like Bush, and we all know that's not good.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 9, 2005 19:08:39 GMT -6
Besides, if you're not a liberal that would ruin the whole trend of all our popes being liberals.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 10, 2005 17:32:53 GMT -6
yes...ian should not be pope....but i should be!! ;D pleeease?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 10, 2005 21:32:04 GMT -6
...on the other hand maybe I should let Ian be pope.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 10, 2005 23:08:59 GMT -6
 why are you out to spite me logan?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 11, 2005 21:07:52 GMT -6
because I'm an evil, sadist person whose only goal in life is to make people like you miserable.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 11, 2005 21:23:41 GMT -6
at least your honest ;D
well, in response to that post...i was going to go off about you saying "people like you" and say that you were being racist against me b/c i'm black...and by people like me, you meant african americans....
but then i came to the depressing realization that i'm not quite black....and i wondered what you meant by people like you...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin on Jan 12, 2005 21:52:30 GMT -6
...right.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkpattie on Jan 12, 2005 23:07:22 GMT -6
will you please vote me for best pope?
|
|
why are you out to spite me logan?